Posts Tagged ‘Evolution’

May the best man's sperm win

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

One behavior that resonates throughout the animal kingdom is that males compete for female attention. Does this type of competition extend beyond the act of mating and persist at a cellular level? Research on deer mice done by Harvard biologist Heidi Fisher suggests that it does. When female deer mice go into heat they will frequently mate with more than one male, meaning that many sperm from different males will be vying for her one egg. Sperm have been found to cooperate with each other and clump together on the way to the egg because those sperm that clump have a better chance of survival than those that make the journey alone. Fisher wanted to know if sperm from different males would cooperate regardless of which male they came from or if sperm would only clump with other sperm from the same mouse.

To examine this question, Fisher dyed the sperm from two male mouses different colors (one green and the other red) and mixed them together in a petri dish and observed what happened. She found that sperm would conglomerate based on the mouse that they originated from, meaning that red sperm would more often than not clump with other red sperm and green sperm would clump with other green sperm. It is not known how sperm can differentiate between similar and dissimilar sperm, but it isn't too hard to understand why such behavior occurs. It all goes back to our selfish genes, the desire to pass one's genetic material on to the next generation, an impulse so strong that even sperm will compete for this privilege.

Religion: An Evolutionary Advantage

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

As the Holiday season rolls around I cant help but recall the first time I discovered that Santa-Clause doesn’t exist.  It was Christmas morning, and I was unwrapping my brand new Stretch-Armstrong doll.

"Just what I always wanted!” I screamed, as tears of joy came streaming down my face.  Hold on a second…  "What’s this?  A price-tag?” I thought,  "Silly elves!  Children don’t pay for Stretch-Armstrongs, Santa gives them for free…  OH NO!”

There I was, only 17 years old when I came face-to-face with the cold and bitter truth that elves were selfish creatures, occasionally charging Santa-Clause for high-quality goods and services.

I soon refuted this theory as well, and settled on the idea that neither Santa, nor elves actually existed.  It wasn’t long before I realized that there was no hard evidence for God’s existence either, which called me to question why faith-based concepts like religion have not only survived but flourished throughout human history.  Many human evolutionary biologist think that religion is common despite its provability because of it’ is evolutionary benefit, because it helps us to survive and reproduce.  Think of religion as a group of ideas that is passed down from generation to generation much in the same way that genes are vertically inherited.  In this way, religion is a group of memes that, just like genes, can either be beneficial or disruptive to the survival of humans, and if beneficial, is passed down to the successor generation to aid in their survival as well.  Here are a few of my thoughts on why religion could be an evolutionarily beneficial group of memes.

  1. Divinity and Godliness are often associated with perfection--In medieval Jewish theology God’s attributes (e.g. Wisdom, Power, Mercy, Justice).  Representations of Gods are often anthropomorphic which can spur a vision of the divine human that the individual can model himself after.  The result is an individual who, because he strives to perfect himself and come closer to God, pushes his personal limits.   Such divinely inspired ambition at the individual level will increase productivity and fitness of the society as a whole.
  2. Anthropomorphism reinforces the idea that "man is the most perfect, next to god.” God created man in his form, man has the same form as god, therefore man is closest of animals to God.  This drives the Homo sapiens superiority complex to allow for more degradation and destruction of the environment (competing genes) in the name of god (who favors our genes).
  3. Religion becomes a distinct advantage when people believe that they are carrying out the will of God.  This can create a strong (and perhaps false) sense of righteousness with regards to the goals of that particular society.   There are many examples of religiously sanctioned military campaigns that resulted in the genocide of other peoples and expansion into their lands.  The result is that individuals of one culture are slaughtered and replaced by another that praises religious conquest. The Christian crusades and American expansion "manifest destiny” are good examples of this phenomenon.
  4. Religion often starts with creation myths.  These resolve fundamental questions about our existence that would otherwise go unsolved by the inadequate scientific progress of early humans.  Acceptance of creation myths allowed early human societies to put the majority of mental effort into productivity and chores rather than pondering the unsolvable.
  5. Religion creates common ground among individuals within a given society and strengthens societal bonds through ritual practice and group worship.  The result is a constructive synergy that results in a net gain of productivity for the society in which those individuals live.  A more productive society means the ability to support more offspring.  This is an evolutionary bonus.
  6. Religion teaches obedience, which is good for establishing a lower class and social hierarch.  Without organizations that have leaders, society runs less efficiently.  Religion reinforces ideas of divine right, and allows the lower class to feel comfortable being ruled, which results in a more complacent, less rebellious societal structure.

Pretty Boys Finish First

Friday, November 6th, 2009

I have a bit of bad news for all you hunkaramas out there. A recent study from the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution suggests that with women popping birth control pills worldwide, masculine men might be left at the wayside for the prettier members of their sex. The study found that women who are on the pill find men with feminine features more attractive than do women who are not on the pill. How could such a little pill cause such a change? Simply put, the pill messes with the cyclic pattern of female mate preference. An earlier study published in Nature found that women are attracted to different kinds of men as a function of where they are in their menstrual cycle. When women  are ovulating they go gaga for the testosterone filled macho types with symmetrical faces and a dissimilar genetic blueprint; they prefer the men who will spawn healthy and strong babies. However, once ovulation ends women begin to fawn over a different type of man: the pretty boy. These men seem more caring, tend to be more girly, and share more genetic similarities with the female than their hunky counterparts.

What might be the point of such mate preference cycle? Women in the long run want a man who will be a good father and will invest time and energy into their offspring, but they also want their child to have the genes from a strong, healthy man. I smell a potential for adultery!

But that problem is not what we are here to discuss. Back to the pill. The birth control pill was released in the early 1960's and is now used by 20%t of women in North America and 50% of women in Western Europe. That is a lot of women. When a woman pops the pill on a daily basis it increases and levels her estrogen and progesterone by simulating the hormonal state of pregancy. The pill therefore mimics the state that women are in when they prefer men with more feminine features.

This explains why women on the pill might be more attracted to Leo DiCaprio than Hugh Jackman.

--
Alvergne, A., Lummaa, V. (2009) Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.

Evolution of Sleep

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

It’s that time of the semester again - when four hours per night of sleep rapidly become the norm.  The time when we regularly find at least half-dozen bleary-eyed students clenching their cappuccinos in the library all-night long, trying to crank out last-minute papers.  We know that in humans, extended sleep deprivation leads to mood alteration, decreased energy, and varying degrees of psychosis.  We know that sleep comes in multiple varieties: REM sleep and long-wave (non-REM) sleep.  But why did sleep come about in the first place? Jerome Siegel offers an evolutionary perspective on the function of sleep in October’s Nature Reviews.  He proposes that sleep is a modification of the dormant states evident throughout the animal and plant kingdoms, and that it has adaptive advantages, including optimally timing behavior.

The human brain devours energy, making up merely ~2% of body weight, but consuming ~20% of our energy budget.  Studies have shown that non-REM sleep can reduce the brain’s energy consumption by 30%, which was a considerable evolutionary advantage when our ancestors had to hunt and gather for every calorie.  Moreover, sleep marks a period of forced inactivity, reducing risks of injury and predation.  We can spot a problem with this mental dormancy though, namely that it slows down the brain’s "reboot” time.  REM sleep provides periods of cortical activation and sensory responsiveness that could facilitate alertness upon waking.

Interestingly, we know that animals can rebound from short periods of sleeplessness in ~30% of the time that it would normally take.  This is explicable if sleep serves the purposes of increasing animals’ efficiency of action, although it does beg the question - "why couldn’t we just sleep less?” From an evolutionary perspective, a short sleep rebound would allow mental processes that occur best during sleep to catch up without hampering overall activity levels.  Sleep has been proposed for a variety of neuro-maintenance functions, such as learning and neurogenesis, but it remains unclear whether these can only take place during sleep.  So, while this knowledge may not help next time an all-night term paper rolls around, at least take comfort that sleep may have evolved to increase our efficiency, not to hamper our labors.

--
Siegel, Jerome M. "Sleep viewed as a state of adaptive inactivity.” Nature Reviews  Neuroscience 10 (October 2009): 747-753