Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Voter Apathy: Blame mom and dad

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

In the dramatic days following the Republican’s senate-race victory in Massachusetts, politicians have been startled into the reminder that victory is always hard to guarantee. A common nightmare is voter apathy – that terrible high school dream where you’re the most popular kid at school but all your friends forget to vote.

While pundits will talk about vague platforms, poor campaigning and finger-pointing as root causes of voter apathy, science suggests alternative explanations. Investigators James H. Fowler (who collaborates prominently with popular Pfoho housemaster Professor Nicholas Christakis) and Christopher Dawes recently showed in 2008 in two independent studies of fraternal and identical twins that voter turnout may be genetically linked and inheritable.

The reasoning, as in most twin studies, was that if voter apathy were inheritable, then identical twins should have more similar patterns of voting or abstaining than fraternal twins. Examining data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, investigators were able to estimate that genetics dictates some 72 percent of differences in voting turnout. Futhermore, roughly 60 percent of differences in other political activity can be explained by genetic makeup. Other geneticists like Dr. Robert Polmin of Kings College, London, suggest that while the association may be true, the percentages concluded may be too high.

Naturally, each of the scientists concede that the remaining percentages that influence whether a person chooses to vote are gained from environmental cues, suggesting that although politicians may tremble at the idea that voter apathy is genetically engrained, there is still hope for behavioral changes caused by inspiring speeches and attractive ads.

In other words, don’t give up Dems. Just because you did it once doesn’t mean you’re allowed to sit back and expect voters to flock.

The Psychological Implications of Recession

Monday, October 5th, 2009

During the political campaigning blitz that characterized the summer of 2008, Republican candidate John McCain’s top economic adviser, Phil Gramm, loosely alluded to the psychological implications of financial downturn—and garnered considerable media criticism—when he characterized the volatile economic situation as merely "a mental recession” and lamented that America had become "a nation of whiners.” The Obama camp passionately countered, "The American people know that our economic problems aren’t just in their heads. They don’t need psychological relief—they need real relief.” The results of the election, in part a referendum on economic reform, shattered Gramm’s economic opinions in favor of Obama’s.

The past year has lain to rest most doubts like Gramm’s of actual economic downturn. Yet, as recent international news suggests, when we tune out the obfuscating undercurrents of combating political agendas, shards of truth may still linger from the McCain camp’s declaration of a "mental recession."

According to this CNN report, workplace stress related to the global economic crisis may be at the root of the string of suicides that has taken place at France Telecom over the past two years. Since early 2008, 37 employees of the telecommunications giant have attempted or committed suicide. The most recent addition to the morbid list was a 51-year-old father, who plunged from a bridge last week and allegedly cited the traumatic climate at his workplace as the reason behind his decision.

Labor unions have echoed his accusation, asserting that dismal working conditions and restructuring—responses to economic downturn—have engendered a dangerously stressful atmosphere for Telecom employees, and Patricia Pegg Jones from the Work Foundation does not see the Telecom phenomenon as unique. As a result of the recession, she says, workers are experiencing higher stress levels and increased pressure due to "more uncertainty and a lack of security.” Furthermore, Pegg Jones points to dichotomous evidence that workers with less control over their jobs are increasingly likely to fall ill and that, still, more workers are succumbing to "presenteeism,” or always going to work, even when unwell.

Perhaps the Obama administration should take a cue from accounts of this sort and consider the effects of an unrestrained invisible hand not only on American workers’ pocketbooks, but on their collective psyche as well. In fact, "psychological relief” may be exactly what’s in order.